Our Mission: We ignite the movement that empowers parents to protect children from harmful chemicals. Donate »

Blog

Healthy World Watch March 5th, 2010

Kathryn Meigel
Thursday, March 04, 2010


Top Tips

Recent Research

  • Federal government to spent $20 million on Bisphenol-A (BPA) study. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) will be looking at the health effects caused by the chemical widely used in food storage. Panel chairman, Representative Edward Mackey, says BPA is polluting waterways via food packaging disposal which may be linked to deformities among wildlife. He warns an increase of human disorders such as infertility, heart disease, and diabetes may also be linked with BPA. NIEHS director Linda Birnbaum told Congress that drinking water may be a "significant route of exposure".

Other News

  • Cell phones may come with warning labels in Maine. David Carpenter, director of the Institute for Health and Environment at the University of Albany, warns that action should be taken now too overt an epidemic of brain cancers. He cites the delay in warning labels on cigarette packs as a lesson to learn from. Although not agreeing with a cancer link, the Food and Drug Administration is urging the cell phone industry to further research and develop products to lower exposure risks. Here are some lower radiation phones currently on the market.
  • Environmental Protection Agency considers banning pesticide spraying near schools, hospitals and child care centers. Each year an average of 37 pesticide drifts are to blame for sickening hundreds in the state of California. As the nation’s largest agricultural producer, California has tried to address the problem with new legislation calling for compensation from growers, but no cases have had successful resolve. Teresa de Anda of Californians for Pesticide Reform, states drifts are so commonplace that incidents often go unreported.
  • Data shows the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been slow to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In 2009 the EPA required polluters to spend $5 billion on clean up efforts, as opposed to $11.8 billion the previous year. Granta Nakayama, who formerly ran the EPA, states the discrepancy could be due to a push to focus on vulnerable populations including children, minorities, and low-income communities. Clashing with industries over mountain-top mining, health risks of atrazine, and the redefining of coal ash as hazardous has slowed progress down. New regulations planned by the EPA have triggered the U.S. Chamber of Congress to file a lawsuit over the legality of the agency’s determining what defines greenhouse gases and their regulation.

 

 

  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Comment



  • Please note: the name you enter here will be displayed on the site with your comment.


  • Please Note: Your email address is not published on the blog, nor shared.

  • Please enter the word you see in the image:

Comment Policy

Print this page | Email a friend


Trusted Partners

View All
  • Nordic Naturals
  • Vital Choice

Read and Learn

It's the trusted guidebook for the Next Generation of Parenting "...that every single parent needs to read..."

PICK UP A COPY
Now In Paperback!

Archives by Month

Like our blog? Get our free widget!